What were the views and ideals of JOTE's co-founders, and how did they differ from each other? In this post, we ask it Stefan Gaillard.
What were the views and ideals of JOTE's co-founders, and how did they differ from each other? In this post, we ask it Martijn van der Meer.
What were the views and ideals of JOTE's co-founders, and how did they differ from each other? In this post, we ask it Max Bautista Perpinyà.
Yesterday, Stefan Gaillard (JOTE, DNUS), Megan Milota (UMCU, DNUS), Robert Dasović and Marcel Hobma organized a workshop on values in science, for the annual Dutch conference on Science Communication.
On February 6, the Open Science Community Utrecht (OSCU) organized a symposium on Open Science at the Faculty of Science of Utrecht University.
When I first heard the term “open science” and realized what it meant, I thought, well, that sounds good, how hard can it be?
As fall hits, we now look back and reflect about the beginning of summer.
What does a congress on Posthumanism have in common with our journal? To be very honest, I had no idea at first.
On the 16th of June, project leader Martijn van der Meer gave a lecture at the Descartes Colloquium for the History and Philosophy of Sciences and Humanities at Utrecht University.
The how-to articles on setting up the infrastructure needed for a journal have been for us a rough sketch of a road that we have been traveling mostly, and proudly, off-road.
One of our first alliances was with the Open Science Community Utrecht (OSCU). Stefan was already a member, so it was relatively easy for him to come into contact with the founders of OSCU.